<\/p>\n
All <\/strong>things are modalities or precipitations of the Infinite Sentient Power which is the Godhead.<\/p>\n
Eugene Halliday – Essays on God<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
++++++++++++<\/p>\n
NOTE: ‘Godhead’. Translated from Greek -‘qeoths’<\/em> – ‘divine nature’ or ‘the quality of being a God’.<\/p>\n
++++++++++++<\/p>\n
Simply we may de\u00adfine Love as the will to work for the optimal dev\u00adelopement of the potentialities of being.<\/p>\n
Eugene Halliday – Essays on God<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
++++++++++++<\/p>\n
When love retreats, power advances.<\/p>\n
Carl Gustav Jung<\/p>\n
++++++++++++<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
<\/p>\n
All that there is is Sentient Power; and this Sentient Power is continually Working for the development of the potentialities of its being. <\/span><\/p>\n
We are circumscribed modalities of this Sentient Power. <\/span><\/p>\n
We are sentient beings then, and we claim to possess ‘consciousness’.<\/span><\/p>\n
If we will to develop this conscious ability such that we can use it to function reflexively, we may ‘join in’ with this act of Working, and thus – as it were – ‘lend a hand’ here, in order to develop these potentialities.<\/span><\/p>\n
If we will<\/strong> to do this Work, then we will ‘realize a profit’ in doing so.<\/span><\/p>\n
If we will<\/strong> not to do this Work, Work will still be going on within us, but obviously it will not be done by<\/strong> us; and<\/span> any development of those potentialities that do happen to take place under these circumstance will proceed at a slower pace. <\/span>Far more importantly though, any profit arising as a consequence of any development here will not be-long to us… A state of affairs that we might like to think about if we suspect there might be something to the idea that there is an<\/span> ‘accounting’, or ‘final judgment’ that takes place just after we pop our clogs … <\/span><\/p>\n
From ‘NOCTURNAL EMISSIONS’<\/span>
\n‘Random Dribbling from the Twilight World of the Undead’<\/span>
\nby Bob Hardy<\/span>
\n(A series of fragments from Bob Hardy’s notebooks – from the late-1970’s to date)<\/span><\/p>\n++++++++++++<\/p>\n
According to those who claimed to have known Eugene Halliday ‘early on’ (and the two people with whom I spoke to at length about this period would be Donald Lord who, during a recorded interview that I conducted with him told me, “I remember exactly when I met Eugene. It was just before his 33rd<\/sup> birthday.” – which would be in 1944 then; and Ken Ratcliffe, who met him after the War, and who related numerous stories, about their time together up until the mid-1960’s, to me) Eugene Halliday’s earliest published work would seem to be ‘Defense of the Devil’ – a copy of which is freely available for downloading from Josh’s site here: http:\/\/www.eugene-halliday.net<\/a><\/p>\n
‘Defense of the Devil’ does not seem, to me, to place the concept ‘All that there is, is Absolute Sentient Power’, center stage. At least in the sense that it constitutes a ‘governing concept’. However, the evidence that Eugene Halliday’s later went on to ‘involve’ the use of his term ‘Sentient Power’ as a ‘governing concept’ can, I believe, be clearly appreciated in most of his subsequent written Work.<\/p>\n
+++++++++<\/p>\n
I would just like to add a word of advice here about Eugene Halliday’s frequent use of the terms ‘Laws’ and ‘Rules’ in many of his texts. Whether or not you accept these claims of his, and why you might chose to do so, is entirely up to you. I simply want to say here that, in my opinion, should you actively decide to engage with these texts of his, it would be a good idea if first of all you did a little Work on your understanding and use of both ‘deductive’ and ‘inductive’ reasoning.<\/p>\n
+++++++++<\/p>\n
So! … What is that<\/strong> question? … Then!<\/p>\n
Well I would say that there are an endless number of questions that revolve around my particular governing concept – ‘All there is is Sentient Power’ – and that all I can really do here is supply you with a couple of examples, and hope that you get the general idea.<\/p>\n
\n
- If all there is is Sentient Power, why did I wake up feeling grumpy this morning, if I felt OK last night just before I went to sleep?<\/li>\n
- If all there is is Sentient Power, and I see a brick on the floor in front of me and say something to myself like, “That brick right there is a complete object ‘in itself’ .. And so it’s actually an example then of ‘circumscribed sentient power’ … What happens to the sentient power if I hit the brick with a hammer, so that there are now two separate objects that I refer to as ‘two half-bricks’ … Are there in fact now two circumscribed objects instead of one? Or is it just all about the way I chose to see them? … Is there some sort of weird reproductive process going on here? Does the sentience of the two new half-brick bits somehow ‘remember’ that they was once a single brick ? What’s going on here, and how does it work?<\/li>\n
- If all there is is Sentient Power, what is my temporary forgetfulness all about?<\/li>\n
- If all there is is Sentient Power, how do I explain my feelings of, say, ‘disgust’?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
I don’t happen to think that these questions I have asked myself (or indeed any question that I could ask myself which begins “If all there is is Sentient Power…”) are trivial…ever! … <\/strong>If only because one of the answers to these questions might seem to refute my governing concept; or that, no matter how hard I tried, I might simply just be incapable of answering it…<\/p>\n
(And just so you know, I have actually<\/strong> Worked on the answers to the above four questions \ud83d\ude42 …)<\/p>\n
++++++++<\/p>\n
The initial impression that I gained, particularly where it concerned Eugene Halliday’s written material, was that it was incredibly rich in the range of subjects that it attempted to ‘take in’. And also – and more importantly for me – Eugene Halliday seemed to be able to ‘link it all together’, or ‘connect it all up’, in what seemed to me to be a very straightforward way – although at that time I had no real ideas as to why it did so, but only the firm conviction that, from his standpoint at least, it did.<\/p>\n
When I revisited this material, and began to subject it to more scrutiny, there were a number of directions taken, or points made, by Eugene Halliday, that I found I could not go along with. But this only served to engage me even more with his Work, because I now had to spend a great deal of time contemplating why it was that I didn’t agree with him, or why I was uneasy about something that he had written.<\/p>\n
My, shall we call it, ‘confrontational interaction’ here, with some aspect or other of Eugene Halliday’s material in no way diminishes my respect for him. In fact I believe this was actually one of the reasons why he produced it.<\/p>\n
++++++++<\/p>\n
If you’re looking for questions that involve a governing concept such as ‘All that there is is Sentient Power’ then I can suggest one of the methods that I came to use. Which was to ask questions that began, “If all that there is is Sentient Power, what is it doing here when I (…. … )?” And then to fill in the blank here with my response(s) to a): whatever news source(s) I happened to have reacted to, or b): whatever form of leisure activity I was engaging in, such as, for example, watching movies, TV shows, or even documentaries, or c): my immersion (my identification with) characters in any novel that I happened to be reading… So no questions here about any obvious ‘creative activity’ of mine then… At least not to begin with.<\/p>\n
+++++++++++<\/p>\n
Finally here, I would like to suggest that you read the following essays by Eugene Halliday. Because, if you do, I believe there would then exist a strong possibility that you will experience what it is that I’m trying to convey here for yourself. The titles below also function as links to the essays themselves; thus you can download them to your computer, and read them at your leisure.<\/p>\n
Words of Power by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
The Structure Of The Psyche by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
The Role of the Unconscious in Religion and Art by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
The Pursuit of Power by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
The Psychogram by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
Psychotherapy Part 1 by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
Notes On Engram Work by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n
IHS – Original pamphlet plus Meditation guide by Eugene Halliday<\/a><\/p>\n